Not-Noticeably.net

Skip navigation

All posts tagged with "PHPAskIt"

Uni, PHPAskIt, funny dates and other blurb

I had my final university exam this morning. I have no idea if it went well or not, the questions were badly worded and rather confusing so I answered them as best I could. If it didn't pass then oh well. Buuuut... That is it. That is the end of university forever! :D Assuming I've passed everything, obviously. But yeah, I'm done. Now the job search starts. *Snore*

Now that studying is done and out of the way, work on PHPAskIt 3.0 will be stepping up. It's almost finished as it is, but I'm wondering if perhaps there needs to be more done to it... Anyone got any suggestions on things they want to see? Most of what has already been suggested both at CodeGrrl and on my previous PAI blog entry have already been implemented.

Also... Is anyone good with AJAX, and willing to contribute to PHPAskIt? Obviously since PAI is a free script this wouldn't involve payment, but I would just need some guidance from an AJAXy wiz if one is available. I've tried doing some AJAX myself and whilst I was moderately successful, I don't really want to put out some JS that will most likely break or be full of security holes because I'm not very good at it.

...has anyone noticed the date today? For people who write the short form of the date in day/month/year format, today is 05/06/07. At 9 minutes past 8 and 10 seconds this morning it was 05/06/07 08:09:10, heh. For those who write the date in month/day/year format, 05/06/07 happened on the 6th of May. Either way, slightly amusing. Woooo

Oh and I've decided the tag cloud will stay for now. I'm going to try and make it all colourful and pretty and stuff and if I can't do that then the ugliness of it right now will be gone (promise) :P Thank you all for your feedback.

PHPAskIt 3.0

1st March 2007 / 18:01

23 comments on "PHPAskIt 3.0"

Tagged: CMS, Geekiness, PHP, PHPAskIt, Scripts, Site, Spam

...is in the works.

Any feature requests or improvements that you would like to see in the new version?

So far, version 3 contains the following new features:

  • Customisation through templates
  • User-end searching
  • Automatic WordPress configuration

As well as the following improvements:

  • Summary by category now optional
  • "Sort alphabetically by category" option removed, though individual category sorting still remains
  • Better URL structure
  • faq.php removed - index.php is now the main page
  • Improved login security
  • Complete code rewrite, now uses Object Oriented Programming
  • New database structure for improved performance

Anyone want anything else?

Also, a new version of NL-PHPMail has been released (2.2), so you should all go and download it right now. Yes.

In other coding-related news, I have successfully managed to integrate Akismet into my CMS. I think it's all working properly, and besides a few problems the other day when either everything was spam or everything was ham (not spam), it seems to be working now and genuine comments are being let through while spammy ones are not. Not that I've had any spam while using this CMS yet, but I'm sure I will.

Time for a little rant

Inspired by a question I received earlier today, and a few sites that were brought to my attention recently...

What is so difficult about leaving a link to a website on a piece of software you have received for free? So-called "linkware" script authors don't make a penny from their scripts. All they ask is that you link back to their site, and in most cases will embed a link into the script they provide. Now I know of people who have spent HOURS going through a script simply to remove the credit line. Apparently the script in question (Cutenews) has its credit line encrypted or something and it's very difficult to remove. Cue the person asking on every forum and emailing everyone they know asking 4 OMGZ HLP PLZ, and when told that the credit line couldn't be removed, they decided not to use the script. WTF?! I don't know about you, but doesn't it seem like a lot more effort to go about trying to get rid of the credit than just, oh I don't know, leaving it where it is?

Some script authors will settle for a link on a credits page. I admit, I'd rather find a credit link there than nowhere else, but I still wonder why these people go to all the effort when they really, really don't have to.

Removing credits is one thing, but when you change the credit to reflect a different name or URL? That is beyond unacceptable. I had someone rename PHPAskIt to "GoddessFAQ 1.2". It was blatantly the same script, the same workings, the same layout, everything. When I contacted the site owner I got a rude reply saying the person had spent ages modifying the script and it wasn't even the same any more. Oh really? Somehow I don't think so. Everything on that site appeared to work in exactly the same way as PHPAskIt. I don't think there's even a million-to-one chance that someone could write exactly the same script purely by coincidence.

Anyway. I now have a layout for my CMS admin panel! Woo, it's a little bit easier to manage things around here now. :) I've fixed quite a few bugs as well - blank tags should now display without errors, non-existent pages/posts should no longer display a blank page, etc., etc.

Oh, and going back to PHPAskIt briefly... Version 3 is in the works, and will be out soonish (no definite date yet). If you have any feature requests, please get them to me ASAP :)

...and now back to my dissertation. Yes. Must not procrastinate any longer.

Ooh shiny things! *Wanders off*

Edit: Oh, and if you are going to remove the credit, don't give me some stupid excuse like "yeah well the code isn't that great so I'm going to be replacing it with my own soon". I don't care whether the code is great or not - it's good enough for your hundreds of questions at this very moment (and the last couple of years or so that you've been using it), so put the credit back. And for your information, the code "isn't that great" because you're using one of the very first versions of the script. Maybe if you upgraded you'd have more luck.

I highly doubt you'll be writing something better than what I did (if you are even doing so - if the script was as bad as you say it is, how can you have used it for almost two years?), even though it was the first version of PAI (and I knew NOTHING about security and stuff back then. It was literally a copy and paste of several PHP snippets) - you, person(s) in question, can't even design a website (LOLZ PAGEBUILDERZ!11), let alone a script. But thanks for leaving that insecure version up, I hope you get hacked through it. Idiots.

Older Entries | Newer Entries