Not-Noticeably.net

Skip navigation

All posts tagged with "Scripts"

Things that annoy me

  1. Idiots who redistribute insecure scripts or scripts that aren't around on the author's site any more.
    I saw a classic the other day: "PHPCurrently (might be hackable) - download here!11one" Might be hackable?! Why on earth would you give it out for others to install then? For your information, PHPCurrently isn't just a "might be" in terms of "hackability" - it's a "definitely".

  2. People who think they know what they're doing and preach about it when they have no idea what they're on about.
    "I LERNT PHP!11!1" No, you learnt PHP includes. "OMFG THATZ LEIK PHP THO I ROOLZ!!11"

  3. WordPress.
    Why are you suddenly not working with my forms any more? I'm not talking about this site - WP (usually) worked fine on here, but it's a client's site. Can't really switch them to my CMS because they need the rich text editor (and no, my CMS doesn't have one :P ). No explanation as to why the form won't work. Same script, same version, same everything... WP just doesn't like it any more. Gah.

  4. University work.
    I have to do my dissertation again, from scratch. The draft I handed in last week was no where near good enough, apparently. Grrr.

  5. Cutenews.
    Now don't get me wrong, I'm sure it's a great script. I've never used it though, and I always associate it with really bad "tween" sites full of rubbish tutorials, stolen layouts and all that. Of course, there are exceptions to those, but still... The URLs are ugly (who wants those long index.php?subaction=showcomments&blahblahblahblah=1&blah=2 things? Not me) and it just ... doesn't appeal to me.

Um, and other things that I can't think of right now. :P

PHPAskIt 3.0

1st March 2007 / 18:01

23 comments on "PHPAskIt 3.0"

Tagged: CMS, Geekiness, PHP, PHPAskIt, Scripts, Site, Spam

...is in the works.

Any feature requests or improvements that you would like to see in the new version?

So far, version 3 contains the following new features:

  • Customisation through templates
  • User-end searching
  • Automatic WordPress configuration

As well as the following improvements:

  • Summary by category now optional
  • "Sort alphabetically by category" option removed, though individual category sorting still remains
  • Better URL structure
  • faq.php removed - index.php is now the main page
  • Improved login security
  • Complete code rewrite, now uses Object Oriented Programming
  • New database structure for improved performance

Anyone want anything else?

Also, a new version of NL-PHPMail has been released (2.2), so you should all go and download it right now. Yes.

In other coding-related news, I have successfully managed to integrate Akismet into my CMS. I think it's all working properly, and besides a few problems the other day when either everything was spam or everything was ham (not spam), it seems to be working now and genuine comments are being let through while spammy ones are not. Not that I've had any spam while using this CMS yet, but I'm sure I will.

Time for a little rant

Inspired by a question I received earlier today, and a few sites that were brought to my attention recently...

What is so difficult about leaving a link to a website on a piece of software you have received for free? So-called "linkware" script authors don't make a penny from their scripts. All they ask is that you link back to their site, and in most cases will embed a link into the script they provide. Now I know of people who have spent HOURS going through a script simply to remove the credit line. Apparently the script in question (Cutenews) has its credit line encrypted or something and it's very difficult to remove. Cue the person asking on every forum and emailing everyone they know asking 4 OMGZ HLP PLZ, and when told that the credit line couldn't be removed, they decided not to use the script. WTF?! I don't know about you, but doesn't it seem like a lot more effort to go about trying to get rid of the credit than just, oh I don't know, leaving it where it is?

Some script authors will settle for a link on a credits page. I admit, I'd rather find a credit link there than nowhere else, but I still wonder why these people go to all the effort when they really, really don't have to.

Removing credits is one thing, but when you change the credit to reflect a different name or URL? That is beyond unacceptable. I had someone rename PHPAskIt to "GoddessFAQ 1.2". It was blatantly the same script, the same workings, the same layout, everything. When I contacted the site owner I got a rude reply saying the person had spent ages modifying the script and it wasn't even the same any more. Oh really? Somehow I don't think so. Everything on that site appeared to work in exactly the same way as PHPAskIt. I don't think there's even a million-to-one chance that someone could write exactly the same script purely by coincidence.

Anyway. I now have a layout for my CMS admin panel! Woo, it's a little bit easier to manage things around here now. :) I've fixed quite a few bugs as well - blank tags should now display without errors, non-existent pages/posts should no longer display a blank page, etc., etc.

Oh, and going back to PHPAskIt briefly... Version 3 is in the works, and will be out soonish (no definite date yet). If you have any feature requests, please get them to me ASAP :)

...and now back to my dissertation. Yes. Must not procrastinate any longer.

Ooh shiny things! *Wanders off*

Edit: Oh, and if you are going to remove the credit, don't give me some stupid excuse like "yeah well the code isn't that great so I'm going to be replacing it with my own soon". I don't care whether the code is great or not - it's good enough for your hundreds of questions at this very moment (and the last couple of years or so that you've been using it), so put the credit back. And for your information, the code "isn't that great" because you're using one of the very first versions of the script. Maybe if you upgraded you'd have more luck.

I highly doubt you'll be writing something better than what I did (if you are even doing so - if the script was as bad as you say it is, how can you have used it for almost two years?), even though it was the first version of PAI (and I knew NOTHING about security and stuff back then. It was literally a copy and paste of several PHP snippets) - you, person(s) in question, can't even design a website (LOLZ PAGEBUILDERZ!11), let alone a script. But thanks for leaving that insecure version up, I hope you get hacked through it. Idiots.

Older Entries | Newer Entries